Ex Vivo Test of Complement Dysregulation in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Kidney Transplant patients: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: In 2014, a complement assay, which evaluates C5b-9 deposition on endothelial cells, was proposed as a biomarker for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Early diagnosis and/or prediction of aHUS (relapse) is pivotal in aHUS kidney transplant recipients who do not receive eculizumab prophylaxis. Methods: In this pilot study, serum samples of transplanted patients with aHUS in remission without eculizumab and patients with other primary kidney diseases (controls) were blinded and evaluated in the complement assay. Results: We included 13 patients with aHUS (4 males, 9 females) of median age of 54 years (range: 35-69) and median of 5.9 years (range: 0.25-14.1) after transplantation; and 13 controls (7 males, 6 females) of median age of 42 years (range: 27-60) and median of 5.8 years (range: 1.6-11.7) after transplantation. There were no significant differences in C5b-9 deposits between patients with aHUS and controls on resting cells (median of 136% [range: 93%-382%] and 121% [range: 75%-200%], respectively) and activated cells (median of 196% [range: 99%-388%] and 170% [range: 113%-260%], respectively). Three patients with aHUS and 4 controls showed elevated C5b-9 deposits on resting cells, which should correspond to active aHUS. None of these patients had laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). During follow-up (15.8 months, range: 6-21), estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable in all. In 5 patients with aHUS with a genetic variant, no increase in C5b-9 deposits was found on activated endothelial cells, which contrasts with the literature suggesting that the test should identify carriers of a genetic variant. Conclusion: Our data question the routine use of the ex vivo complement assay in kidney transplant patients. Future studies should evaluate the test characteristics of assay in kidney transplant patients.

Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis in Disguise: Cryofibrinogenemia as Variant of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance.

Monoclonal gammopathy with cryoactivity (ie, cryoglobulins) that causes glomerulonephritis is considered within the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Cryofibrinogenemia (cryoactivity of coagulation factors) is very rarely associated with glomerulonephritis. We present a 39-year-old woman with a relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Laboratory investigation detected cryofibrinogen; the precipitate consisted of fibrinogen and a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein; IgG-λ), and the latter was also detected in serum (4g/L). Initial conventional immunosuppressive therapy resulted in temporary renal remission. In view of the M-protein, subsequent therapy consisted of bortezomib/dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and resulted in a very good partial hematological response and temporary renal remission. However, after hematological and renal relapse, we performed unique experiments to clarify the role of the M-protein. Mixing patient serum with donor plasma resulted in cryoactivity, composed of M-protein+fibrinogen. Patient plasma deprived of M-protein did not have cryoactivity. Therefore, cryoactivity was dependent on the M-protein. We started lenalidomide, which resulted in very good partial hematological and renal remission. Thus, cryofibrinogenemia can be the consequence of an M-protein, which we suggest should be defined as monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.

Eculizumab Rescue Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation.

Introduction: Since 2016, kidney transplantation in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the Netherlands is performed without eculizumab prophylaxis. Eculizumab is given in case of posttransplant aHUS recurrence. Eculizumab therapy is monitored in the CUREiHUS study. Methods: All participating kidney transplant patients who received eculizumab therapy for a suspected posttransplant aHUS recurrence were evaluated. Overall recurrence rate was monitored prospectively at Radboud University Medical Center. Results: In the period from January 2016 until October 2020, we included 15 (12 females, 3 males; median age 42 years, range 24-66 years) patients with suspected aHUS recurrence after kidney transplantation in this study. The time interval to recurrence showed a bimodal distribution. Seven patients presented early after transplantation (median 3 months, range 0.3-8.8 months), with typical aHUS features: rapid loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eight patients presented late (median 46 months, range 18-69 months) after transplantation. Of these, only 3 patients had systemic TMA, whereas 5 patients presented with slowly deteriorating eGFR without systemic TMA. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in improvement or stabilization of eGFR in 14 patients. Eculizumab discontinuation was tried in 7 patients; however, it was successful only in 3. At the end of the follow-up (median 29 months, range 3-54 months after start of eculizumab), 6 patients had eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Graft loss had occurred in 3 of them. Overall, aHUS recurrence rate without eculizumab prophylaxis was 23%. Conclusions: Rescue treatment of posttransplant aHUS recurrence is effective; however, some patients suffer from irreversible loss of kidney function, likely caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment and/or too aggressive discontinuation of eculizumab. Physicians should be aware that recurrence of aHUS can present without evidence of systemic TMA.

Proteinuria and Exposure to Eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Kidney damage, a common condition in patients with aHUS, may result in proteinuria. Because proteinuria may affect the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins such as eculizumab, the aim of our study was to investigate the effect of proteinuria on eculizumab pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This study was an ancillary study of a previously performed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of eculizumab in aHUS. Proteinuria, measured as urinary protein-creatinine ratios (UPCR), was investigated as covariate for eculizumab clearance. Thereafter, we evaluated the effect of proteinuria on the exposure to eculizumab in a simulation study for the initial phase and for a 2-weekly and 3-weekly interval in the maintenance phase. RESULTS: The addition of UPCR as a linear covariate on clearance to our base model resulted in a statistically improved fit ( P < 0.001) and reduction of unexplained variability in clearance. From our data, we predicted that in the initial phase, 16% of the adult patients with severe proteinuria (UPCR >3.1 g/g) will have inadequate complement inhibition (classical pathway activity >10%) on day 7 of treatment, compared with 3% of the adult patients without proteinuria. None of the pediatric patients will have inadequate complement inhibition at day 7 of treatment. For the 2- and 3-weekly dosing intervals, we predicted that, respectively, 18% and 49% of the adult patients and, respectively, 19% and 57% of the pediatric patients with persistent severe proteinuria will have inadequate complement inhibition, compared with, respectively, 2% and 13% of the adult patients and, respectively, 4% and 22% of the pediatric patients without proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: Severe proteinuria is associated with a higher risk of underexposure to eculizumab. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register, NTR5988/NL5833.

Early Eculizumab Withdrawal in Patients With Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Native Kidneys Is Safe and Cost-Effective: Results of the CUREiHUS Study.

Introduction: The introduction of eculizumab has improved the outcome in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). The optimal treatment strategy is debated. Here, we report the results of the CUREiHUS study, a 4-year prospective, observational study monitoring unbiased eculizumab discontinuation in Dutch patients with aHUS after 3 months of therapy. Methods: All pediatric and adult patients with aHUS in native kidneys and a first-time eculizumab treatment were evaluated. In addition, an extensive cost-consequence analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the study from January 2016 to October 2020. In 17 patients (81%), a complement genetic variant or antibodies against factor H were identified. All patients showed full recovery of hematological thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) parameters after the start of eculizumab. A renal response was noted in 18 patients. After a median treatment duration of 13.6 weeks (range 2.1-43.9), eculizumab was withdrawn in all patients. During follow-up (80.7 weeks [0.0-236.9]), relapses occurred in 4 patients. Median time to first relapse was 19.5 (14.3-53.6) weeks. Eculizumab was reinitiated within 24 hours in all relapsing patients. At last follow-up, there were no chronic sequelae, i.e., no clinically relevant increase in serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, and/or hypertension in relapsing patients. The low sample size and event rate did not allow to determine predictors of relapse. However, relapses only occurred in patients with a likely pathogenic variant. The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the total medical expenses of our population were only 30% of the fictive expenses that would have been made when patients received eculizumab every fortnight. Conclusion: It is safe and cost-effective to discontinue eculizumab after 3 months of therapy in patients with aHUS in native kidneys. Larger data registries are needed to determine factors associated with suboptimal kidney function recovery during eculizumab treatment, factors to predict relapses, and long-term outcomes of eculizumab discontinuation.

Proposal for individualized dosing of eculizumab in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: patient friendly and cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Eculizumab is a lifesaving yet expensive drug for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Current guidelines advise a fixed-dosing schedule, which can be suboptimal and inflexible in the individual patient. METHODS: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) [classical pathway (CP) activity levels] of eculizumab in 48 patients, consisting of 849 time-concentration data and 569 CP activity levels. PK-PD modelling was performed with non-linear mixed-effects modelling. The final model was used to develop improved dosing strategies. RESULTS: A PK model with parallel linear and non-linear elimination rates best described the data with the parameter estimates clearance 0.163 L/day, volume of distribution 6.42 L, maximal rate 29.6 mg/day and concentration for 50% of maximum rate 37.9 mg/L. The PK-PD relation between eculizumab concentration and CP activity was described using an inhibitory Emax model with the parameter estimates baseline 101%, maximal inhibitory effect 95.9%, concentration for 50% inhibition 22.0 mg/L and  Hill coefficient 5.42. A weight-based loading dose, followed by PK-guided dosing was found to improve treatment. On day 7, we predict 99.95% of the patients to reach the efficacy target (CP activity <10%), compared with 94.75% with standard dosing. Comparable efficacy was predicted during the maintenance phase, while the dosing interval could be prolonged in ∼33% of the population by means of individualized dosing. With a fixed-dose 4-week dosing interval to allow for holidays, treatment costs will increase by 7.1% and we predict 91% of the patients will reach the efficacy target. CONCLUSIONS: A patient-friendly individualized dosing strategy of eculizumab has the potential to improve treatment response at reduced costs.

COVID-19 vaccination and Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with rare but severe complications characterized by thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Methods and Results: Here we present three patients who developed de novo or relapse atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in native kidneys, a median of 3 days (range 2-15) after mRNA-based (Pfizer/BioNTech's, BNT162b2) or adenoviral (AstraZeneca, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccination. All three patients presented with evident hematological signs of TMA and AKI, and other aHUS triggering or explanatory events were absent. After eculizumab treatment, kidney function fully recovered in 2/3 patients. In addition, we describe two patients with dubious aHUS relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. To assess the risks of vaccination, we retrospectively evaluated 29 aHUS patients (n=8 with native kidneys) without complement-inhibitory treatment, who received a total of 73 COVID-19 vaccinations. None developed aHUS relapse after vaccination. Conclusion: In conclusion, aHUS should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia, especially if co-occuring with mechanical hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Still, the overall risk is limited and we clearly advise continuation of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a previous episode of aHUS, yet conditional upon clear patient instruction on how to recognize symptoms of recurrence. At last, we suggest monitoring serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, MAHA parameters, and blood pressure days after vaccination.

Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In the Netherlands, patients with aHUS are treated with a restrictive eculizumab regime and are included in a national observational study (CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register NTR5988/NL5833). METHODS: For this interim safety analysis, we evaluated the outcome of all adult patients with a suspected relapse, defined as the need to intensify eculizumab after tapering or withdrawal of therapy. RESULTS: We describe 11 patients who received renewed eculizumab therapy because of suspected relapse. In three patients with aHUS in native kidneys, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) returned to baseline value and remained stable without overt proteinuria after follow-up. Six out of eight transplanted patients responded to eculizumab therapy with improvement in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, a reduction of eGFR ≥25% was observed in three of these transplanted patients, which was attributed to the aHUS relapse in only one patient. CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis suggests that re-treatment with eculizumab after relapse is safe and feasible. We will continue to use our restrictive treatment strategy.

Different Aspects of Classical Pathway Overactivation in Patients With C3 Glomerulopathy and Immune Complex-Mediated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis.

The rare and heterogeneous kidney disorder C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is characterized by dysregulation of the alternative pathway (AP) of the complement system. C3G is often associated with autoantibodies stabilizing the AP C3 convertase named C3 nephritic factors (C3NeF). The role of classical pathway (CP) convertase stabilization in C3G and related diseases such as immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated the CP convertase activity in patients with C3G and IC-MPGN. Using a refined two-step hemolytic assay, we measured the stability of CP convertases directly in the serum of 52 patients and 17 healthy controls. In four patients, CP convertase activity was prolonged compared to healthy controls, i.e. the enzymatic complex was stabilized. In three patients (2 C3G, 1 IC-MPGN) the convertase stabilization was caused by immunoglobulins, indicating the presence of autoantibodies named C4 nephritic factors (C4NeFs). Importantly, the assay also enabled detection of non-immunoglobulin-mediated stabilization of the CP convertase in one patient with C3G. Prolonged CP convertase activity coincided with C3NeF activity in all patients and for up to 70 months of observation. Crucially, experiments with C3-depleted serum showed that C4NeFs stabilized the CP C3 convertase (C4bC2a), that does not contain C3NeF epitopes. All patients with prolonged CP convertase activity showed clear signs of complement activation, i.e. lowered C3 and C5 levels and elevated levels of C3d, C3bc, C3bBbP, and C5b-9. In conclusion, this work provides new insights into the diverse aspects and (non-)immunoglobulin nature of factors causing CP convertase overactivity in C3G/IC-MPGN.

Treatment-resistant nephrotic syndrome in dense deposit disease: complement-mediated glomerular capillary wall injury?

BACKGROUND: The C3 glomerulopathies (C3G) are recently defined glomerular diseases, attributed to abnormal complement regulation. Dense deposit disease (DDD) is part of the spectrum of C3G, characterized by electron-dense deposits in the lamina densa of the glomerular basement membrane. Patients with DDD present with hematuria, variable degrees of proteinuria, and kidney dysfunction. Kidney biopsies typically disclose proliferative and inflammatory patterns of injury. Treatment with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil has been shown to achieve remission of proteinuria in a significant proportion of C3G patients. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: We report two patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome while on immunosuppressive therapy. Repeat kidney biopsies disclosed massive C3 deposits with foot process effacement in the absence of proliferative or inflammatory lesions on light microscopy. CONCLUSION: These cases, coupled with data from animal models of disease and the variable response to eculizumab in C3G patients, illustrate that two different pathways might be involved in the development of kidney injury in C3G: a C5-independent pathway leading to glomerular capillary wall injury and the development of proteinuria versus a C5-dependent pathway that causes proliferative glomerulonephritis and kidney dysfunction.

Case Report: Variable Pharmacokinetic Profile of Eculizumab in an aHUS Patient.

Background: With the introduction of eculizumab, a C5-inhibitor, morbidity and mortality improved significantly for patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). In view of the high costs, actual needs of the drug, and increasing evidence in literature, aHUS patients can be treated according to a restrictive eculizumab regimen. We retrospectively analyzed the pharmacokinetic and dynamic parameters of eculizumab in one patient in time, emphasizing various factors which could be taken into account during tapering of treatment. Case Presentation: A nowadays 18-year-old male with a severe, frequently relapsing form of atypical HUS due to a hybrid CFH/CFHR1 gene in combination with the homozygous factor H haplotype, required chronic plasma therapy (PT), including periods with plasma infusion, from the age of onset at 5 months until initiation of eculizumab at the age of 11 years. A mild but stable chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 9 years of disease remission enabled prolongation of eculizumab interval. At the age of 15 years, a sudden yet multifactorial progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed, without any signs of disease recurrence. However, an acquired glomerulocystic disease, a reduced left kidney function, and abnormal abdominal venous system of unknown etiology were found. In addition, after an aHUS relapse, an unexpected increase in intra-patient variability of eculizumab concentrations was seen. Retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a change in eculizumab clearance, associated with a simultaneous increase in proteinuria. Conclusion: High intra-patient variability of eculizumab pharmacokinetics were observed over time, emphasizing the necessity for adequate and continuous therapeutic drug monitoring in aHUS patients. Eculizumab serum trough levels together with complement activation markers (CH50) should be frequently assessed, especially during tapering of drug therapy and/or changing clinical conditions in the patient. In addition, an increase in proteinuria could result in urinary eculizumab loss, indicating that urinary monitoring of eculizumab may be important in aHUS patients with an unexplained decline in serum concentrations.

Correction to: Eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: strategies toward restrictive use.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained two mistakes. The presentation of Table 1 and Fig. 1 was incorrect. The corrected versions are given below.

Eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: strategies toward restrictive use.

With the introduction of the complement C5-inhibitor eculizumab, a new era was entered for patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Eculizumab therapy very effectively reversed thrombotic microangiopathy and reduced mortality and morbidity. Initial guidelines suggested lifelong treatment and recommended prophylactic use of eculizumab in aHUS patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, there is little evidence to support lifelong therapy or prophylactic treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Worldwide, there is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal dose and duration of treatment, particularly in view of the high costs and potential side effects of eculizumab. An increasing but still limited number of case reports and small cohort studies suggest that a restrictive treatment regimen is feasible. We review the current literature and focus on the safety and efficacy of restrictive use of eculizumab. Our current treatment protocol is based on restrictive use of eculizumab. Prospective monitoring will provide more definite proof of the feasibility of such restrictive treatment.

Safety and effectiveness of restrictive eculizumab treatment in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome.

Background: Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but severe form of thrombotic microangiopathy as a consequence of complement dysregulation. aHUS has a poor outcome with high mortality and >50% of patients developing end-stage renal disease. Since the end of 2012, these outcomes have greatly improved with the introduction of eculizumab. Currently the duration of treatment is debated. Most guidelines advise lifelong treatment. However, there is no hard evidence to support this advice. Historically, a substantial number of aHUS patients were weaned of plasma therapy, often without disease recurrence. Moreover, the long-term consequences of eculizumab treatment are unknown. In this retrospective study we describe 20 patients who received a restrictive treatment regimen. Methods: All aHUS patients who presented in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2012 and 2016 and who received eculizumab are described. Clinical, diagnostic and follow-up data were gathered and reviewed. Results: Twenty patients (14 adults, 6 children) with aHUS have received eculizumab. Eculizumab was tapered in all and stopped in 17 patients. aHUS recurrence occurred in five patients. Due to close monitoring, recurrence was detected early and eculizumab was restarted. No clinical sequela such as proteinuria or progressive kidney dysfunction was detected subsequently. In total, eculizumab has been discontinued in 13 patients without aHUS recurrence, of which 5 are event free for >1 year. With this strategy ∼€11.4 million have been saved. Conclusions: A restrictive eculizumab regimen in aHUS appears safe and effective. Prospective studies should further evaluate the most optimal treatment strategy.

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The development of complement inhibitors has greatly improved the outcome of patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), making kidney transplantation a more feasible option. Although prophylactic eculizumab therapy may prevent recurrent disease after transplantation, its necessity for all transplant recipients is debated. STUDY DESIGN: A case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with aHUS who underwent living donor kidney transplantation after 2011 at 2 university centers, prospectively followed up with a protocol of eculizumab therapy limited to only recipients with documented posttransplantation recurrent thrombotic microangiopathy. In addition, the protocol emphasized lower target level tacrolimus and aggressive treatment of high blood pressure. OUTCOMES: Recurrence of aHUS, kidney function, acute kidney injury. RESULTS: We describe 12 female and 5 male patients with a mean age of 47 years. 5 patients had lost a previous transplant due to aHUS recurrence. 16 patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in genes encoding complement factor H, C3, or membrane cofactor protein, giving a high risk for aHUS recurrence. Median follow-up after transplantation was 25 (range, 7-68) months. One patient had aHUS recurrence 68 days after transplantation, which was successfully treated with eculizumab. 3 patients were treated for rejection and 2 patients developed BK nephropathy. At the end of follow-up, median serum creatinine concentration was 106 (range, 67-175) µmol/L and proteinuria was negligible. LIMITATIONS: Small series and short duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor kidney transplantation in aHUS without prophylactic eculizumab treatment appears feasible.

Acute intoxications: differences in management between six Dutch hospitals.

CONTEXT: Acute intoxications are frequently seen in Dutch hospitals. Based on single-centre studies and the fact that there are no clear guidelines, we hypothesised that hospital admission of acute intoxications may vary. Furthermore, decontamination treatment of poisonings may differ between hospitals, as earlier studies showed that adherence to international guidelines concerning decontamination may be poor. OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify possible variations in Dutch hospital admission and decontamination treatment of patients with acute intoxications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on acute intoxications was retrospectively collected from patient records from the emergency departments of six Dutch hospitals. All patients older than 14 years who presented between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2008 were included in the study. RESULTS: The percentage of suicide attempts differed significantly between the hospitals (25-73%, p < 0.0001) as equally the percentage of intoxications with drugs of abuse (18-61%, p < 0.0001). Marked differences in admission rates were found (27-78%, p < 0.0001) and these differences remained even when intoxications because of suicide attempts and drugs of abuse were analysed separately (admission rate of 52-87%, p < 0.0001 and 8-71%, p < 0.0001 respectively). Reported consultation with the National Poisons Information Centre differed between hospitals (range 0% to 80-100%). No statistical differences were found between hospitals for the use of activated charcoal (16.1-42.5%, p = 0.037). Gastric lavage was used infrequently in all hospitals. (6.6-16.7%, p = 0.614). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The admission rate of patients with an acute intoxication varies considerably, especially in the case of intoxications with drugs of abuse. Consultations with the National Poisons Information Centre differed between the six hospitals. Rates of decontamination did not vary, which may indicate adherence to guidelines by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. National guidelines or admission algorithms may reduce variations in poisoning management and make the care for these patients more efficient.